This post is a first in a series entitled Game Theory 101.
Before we can study game theory and strategic interaction, we have to start by defining what exactly a game is.
What the average person calls a game and what economists call a game are two very different things. Economists consider any form of strategic interaction a game and almost every decision you make every day is a strategic interaction. Should I go to class to today or sleep in? Should I go to work today or call in sick? Should I buy product x or product y? Should I get a coffee or a latte? Should I wear this shirt or that shirt? All these situations (and all the strategic interactions you have every day) have three things in common: they have players, strategies, and payoffs.
In order to be considered a game and interaction must have three things:
Players: Without players there can be no strategic interaction. Every game has at least one player but usually there are two or more. When you decide whether you should go to class or sleep in, the players are you and the professor. When you decide whether to go to work or call in sick, the players are you and your boss.
Strategies: In order to be a game the players must have strategies or actions they can choose. In our first example about going to class, the strategies are going to class or sleeping in. In our second example of going to work, the strategies are going to work or calling in sick.
Payoffs: Finally, every player must have payoffs associated with their strategies. In other words, they must care about the outcome of the game. Payoffs can be represented by anything but usually in game theory they are represented by numbers which usually represent utility. Utility is defined as the amount of satisfaction someone receives from something. Payoffs are very rarely represented by monetary units. Note that payoffs can also be negative.
These three things must be present in order for an interaction to be considered a game. I should also point out that in game theory, and economics, we assume people are rational which I know is usually far from the truth. The goal in game theory is to analyze a strategic interaction and find what the optimal decision for the players to make is. We then try to predict what the outcome will be if the game is played.